89 Iowa 506 | Iowa | 1893
In Davis v. Fish, supra, there was no claim that the defects in the fiatboats, the subject of the controversy, were open and visible, nor'was a waiver
The appellant states the rule as follows: uFourthly, when a manufacturer or dealer contracts to supply an
Our conclusion is that, under the law and the facts, the appellant is not entitled to recover on the counterclaim. The .judgment of the district court is, therefore, aeeirmeir