History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berryhill v. State
276 S.C. 183
S.C.
1981
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

Appellant and two codefendants were found guilty of armed robbery and each was sentenced to imprisonment for twenty-three (23) years.

Appellant applied for Post-Conviction Relief and his application was denied after an evidentiary hearing. This appeal followed.

Counsel for appellant has filed a brief under authority of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), asserting that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and requesting permission to withdraw from further representation. Appellant has not filed a pro se brief. . : . I ■! "'pH

During the pendency of this appeal appellant escaped from custody. We decline to hear the appeal of a party who by his escape has evaded the process of the Court and refuses to submit himself to its jurisdiction. State v. Murrell, 33 S. C. 83, 11 S. E. 682 (1890); State v. Johnson, 44 S. C. 556, 21 S. E. 806 (1895). Accordingly, it is ordered that this appeal be dismissed and counsel’s request to withdraw is granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Berryhill v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Apr 9, 1981
Citation: 276 S.C. 183
Docket Number: 21429
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Berryhill v. State, 276 S.C. 183