| Mo. | Oct 15, 1879
This was an action brought under the statute which gives a lien for keeping and boarding animals. The only question in the case is, whether a party can obtain a judgment for the sum due for such keeping and boarding, if it shall appear at the trial that he has, for any reason, lost his lien. In the present case there was a dispute between the parties as to the amount' due for feeding the defendant’s animals, and a tender was made by the defendant of a sum less than1 the plaintiff claimed to be due, but greater than the jury found to be due. As a tender of the sum due extinguished the plaintiff’s lien, and there could, therefore, be no judgment for the enforcement of any lien, the common pleas court refused to render an ordinary judgment for the plaintiff for the amount found by the jury to be due him, but dismissed his suit. In eases where the claim of the plaintiff seems to be made in good faith for a sum greater than that tendered by the defendant, and the existence of the lien is, therefore, made to depend upon whether the plaintiff’ or the defendant is right as to the sum due, and the plaintiff’ fails at the trial to establish his claim to more than has been tendered, we-can see no good reason for refusing him an ordinary judgment