History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berry v. State
113 So. 626
Ala. Ct. App.
1927
Check Treatment

Defendant was convicted of burglary. The corpus delicti was proven. There was evidence tending to prove that defendant was in possession of some of the goods stolen from the store at the time of the burglary. There was an effort on the part of defendant to explain this possession. This was a jury question.

We find no prejudicial error in the rulings of the court or in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Berry v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 7, 1927
Citation: 113 So. 626
Docket Number: 8 Div. 541.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.