History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berry v. Robinson
9 Johns. 121
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1812
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plaintiff was properly nonsuited, for not

proving demand of payment on the maker, and notice of his default to the endorsor. Though the note was endorsed long after it was due, yet the endorsee took it subject to this condition. The books make no distinction, on this point, whether a note be endorsed before or after it is due. The endorsement, in every case, where a drawer really exists, is a conditional contract to pay in the event of a demand, or due diligence to make a demand on the maker, and his default. It was equivalent in this case, to an order on the drawer to pay the amount. The motion to set aside nonsuit is denied.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Berry v. Robinson
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1812
Citation: 9 Johns. 121
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.