History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berry v. Potter
57 N.J.L. 201
N.J.
1894
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by the court below.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Abbett, Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Van Sycicel, Brown, Sims, Smith. 11.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Berry v. Potter
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 15, 1894
Citation: 57 N.J.L. 201
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.