History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berry v. King
106 S. Ct. 2290
SCOTUS
1986
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan,

dissenting.

Adhering to my view that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227 (1976), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

This is yet another capital case in which defense counsel failed to present any mitigation evidence whatsoever during the sentencing phase of a defendant’s trial. I believe that, except perhaps in the extraordinary case, counsel’s failure even to attempt to give the jury some reason for believing a defendant is not deserving of death denies defendant his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel. And I have yet to see that extraordinary case. I would grant the petition for certiorari and vacate the sentence.

Case Details

Case Name: Berry v. King
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 2, 1986
Citation: 106 S. Ct. 2290
Docket Number: No. 85-5446
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.