History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berrong v. State
180 Ga. 622
Ga.
1935
Check Treatment
Beck, Presiding Justice.

Bon Berrong was convicted of the offense of murder, and made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. The only ground of the motion which is insisted upon is that one of the jurors trying the case was related to the prosecutor within the prohibited degree. This ground, if established by *623proof, would, require the granting of a new trial. From examination of the affidavits submitted by the movant it appears that one of the deponents did testify to facts that tended to establish the relationship; and there were others tending to corroborate this. On the other hand, by an affidavit submitted by the State and corroborated by certain other affidavits, an issue of fact as to the relationship was made. That being true, the determination of this issue was within the discretion of the trial judge; and his finding that the relationship claimed did not exist will not be set aside, it not appearing from all the evidence submitted upon this question that there was an abuse of discretion. Consequently the judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Atkinson, J., concurs in the result.

Case Details

Case Name: Berrong v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 18, 1935
Citation: 180 Ga. 622
Docket Number: No. 10498
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.