History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berrien v. Westervelt
12 Wend. 194
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1834
Check Treatment

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The coroner had no right to administer the oath to the plaintiff. He is not of the number of those officers-to whom general power is given to admin*195ister oaths or take affidavits, 2 R. S. 284, § 49; and no special authority is given to him to take an affidavit in any cause depending in court. The section referred to in 2 R. S. 552, § 11, does not contemplate a proceeding in an action depending in court; and although the sureties to a replevin bond may be sworn and examined by the coroner, he is not authorized to take an affidavit to be used in a cause. The affidavit not having been sworn to before a proper officer, was a nullity, and the defect is fatal. The statute forbids the executing of the writ, unless the affidavit be made and sworn to before some proper officer. 2 R. S. 523, § 7. The compliance with the statute is in the nature of a condition precedent.

Motion granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Berrien v. Westervelt
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 19, 1834
Citation: 12 Wend. 194
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.