History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bernstein v. Feiner
11 N.Y.3d 917
NY
2009
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Although petitioner’s facial and as-applied challenges to the Finneran Law (L 1982, ch 891) were addressed by the Appellate Division, they are not substantial. Petitioner’s facial challenge, insofar as it is predicated on New York Constitution article VIII, § 3, was not raised at the Appellate Division and therefore was not directly involved.

Acting Chief Judge Ciparick and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

*919Appeal dismissed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Bernstein v. Feiner
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 22, 2009
Citation: 11 N.Y.3d 917
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.