History
  • No items yet
midpage
224 S.W.3d 50
Mo. Ct. App.
2007

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary Howe-Bernhardt appeals from the judgment dissolving her marriage to Daniel Bernhardt. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, that no error of law appears, and that the court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Bernhardt v. HOWE-BERNHARDT
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 6, 2007
Citations: 224 S.W.3d 50; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 355; 2007 WL 654238; WD 65670
Docket Number: WD 65670
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Bernhardt v. HOWE-BERNHARDT, 224 S.W.3d 50