History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States
293 F.2d 519
D.C. Cir.
1961
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and possessing obscene pictures with intent to exhibit them. D.C.Code (1951) § 22-2001. When an alleged obscene film was shown in court, the public except newspaper reporters were excluded. There was other evidence. Appellant’s right to a public trial was not denied. Gillars v. United States, 87 U.S.App.D.C. 16, 31, 182 F.2d 962, 977; Iva Ikuko Toguri D’Aguino v. United States, 9 Cir., 192 F.2d 338, 365, certiorari denied, 343 U.S. 935, 72 S.Ct. 772, 96 L.Ed. 1343, rehearing denied, 345 U.S. 931, 72 S.Ct. 1053, 96 L.Ed. 1358.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bernard W. Lancaster v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jun 15, 1961
Citation: 293 F.2d 519
Docket Number: 16229_1
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.