History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berkowitz v. Holland & Knight
498 So. 2d 1066
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1986
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Reversed. We believe the appellant’s amended complaint stated a cause of action for tortious interference with an existing contractual relationship against all of the appellees. See Wackenhut Corporation v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 383 (Fla.1981).

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Berkowitz v. Holland & Knight
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 24, 1986
Citation: 498 So. 2d 1066
Docket Number: No. 85-2822
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.