Berkowitz v. Holland & Knight

498 So. 2d 1066 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1986

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. We believe the appellant’s amended complaint stated a cause of action for tortious interference with an existing contractual relationship against all of the appellees. See Wackenhut Corporation v. Maimone, 389 So.2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), rev. denied, 411 So.2d 383 (Fla.1981).

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.