Bergman v. Bergman

434 So. 2d 1037 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1983

PER CURIAM.

The so-called “temporary restraining order”^[1] entered below, which prohibited the appellant-mother from removing the parties’ child from Florida, was not supported by any competent evidence entitling the father to that relief and is therefore reversed.

[1] 1. Notwithstanding its title, since the order was entered after notice and hearing, we regard it as a preliminary injunction, see United Sanitation Services of Hillsborough, Inc. v. City of Tampa, 302 So.2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) and review it pursuant to Fla.R.App. 9.130(a)(3)(B).