Bergdoll v. Harrigan, No. 751

No. 751 | SCOTUS | Apr 26, 1915

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, upon the authority of rule 6, clause 5; Micas v. Williams, 104 U.S. 556" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1882-01-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/micas-v-williams-90500?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="90500">104 U. S. 556; The Alaska, 130 U.S. 201" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1889-04-01" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/the-alaska-92461?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="92461">130 U. S. 201; Chanute City v. Trader, 132 U.S. 210" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1889-11-25" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/chanute-city-v-trader-92592?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="92592">132 U. S. 210, 214; Northern Pacific Railroad v. Amato, 144 U.S. 465" court="SCOTUS" date_filed="1892-04-11" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/northern-pacific-railroad-v-amato-93333?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="93333">144 U. S. 465, 473, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Joseph Gilfillan and Mr. George S. Graham for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph W. Catharine for the defendant in error.