History
  • No items yet
midpage
Berg v. Prager
216 A.D. 735
N.Y. App. Div.
1926
Check Treatment
Pee Cubiam:

The proof of plaintiff evidenced conditions which, if found to have existed, would have justified a conclusion of neglect on the part of the defendants, and plaintiff’s own care was sufficiently shown to warrant submission to the jury of the question of her freedom from contributory negligence. The judgment should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Dowling, Merrell, Finch, McAvoy and Martin, JJ. Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to .appellant to abide the event.

Case Details

Case Name: Berg v. Prager
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1926
Citation: 216 A.D. 735
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.