History
  • No items yet
midpage
Benton v. U.S. Bank
171 So. 3d 764
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2015
Check Treatment

ROBERT BENTON and HEATHER STOKES v. U.S. BANK, National Association, as Trustee for RASC 2006KS6 and MERS

Case No. 2D14-805

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Opinion filed July 17, 2015.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Sandra Taylor, Associate Senior Judge.

Damian G. Waldman of Law Offices of Damian G. Waldman, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellants.

No appearance for Appellees.

BLACK, Judge.

Robert Benton and Heather Stokes challenge the order denying a “renewed” motion to set aside foreclosure sale. As to Mr. Benton, we affirm. See, e.g., Huddle House v. Peralta, 754 So. 2d 753, 753-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (affirming order

on appeal due to appellant‘s failure to file an adequate appendix despite being directed to do so pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220). As to Ms. Stokes, we dismiss the appeal. See Quinones v. Se. Inv. Grp. Corp., 138 So. 3d 549, 549-50 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (dismissing appeal of foreclosure final judgment where appellants had no standing to appeal the final judgment and otherwise failed to seek timely review of the order denying the motion to intervene).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

CRENSHAW and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Benton v. U.S. Bank
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 17, 2015
Citation: 171 So. 3d 764
Docket Number: 2D14-805
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In