No. 201 | SCOTUS | Dec 16, 1968
Ct. Sp. App. Md. [Certiorari granted, 392 U.S. 925" date_filed="1968-06-17" court="SCOTUS" case_name="John Dalmer Benton v. Maryland">392 U. S. 925.] Case restored to the docket for reargument on March 24, 1969, limited to the following question, not specified in the original writ: Does the “concurrent sentence doctrine,” enunciated in Hira-bayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81" date_filed="1943-06-21" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Hirabayashi v. United States">320 U. S. 81, 105, and subsequent cases, have continuing validity in light of such decisions as Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629" date_filed="1968-06-03" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Ginsberg v. New York">390 U. S. 629, 633, n. 2, Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54" date_filed="1968-10-14" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Peyton v. Rowe">391 U. S. 54, Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234" date_filed="1968-05-20" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Carafas v. LaVallee">391 U. S. 234, 237-238, and Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40" date_filed="1968-06-10" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Sibron v. New York">392 U. S. 40, 50-58? The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States and to participate in oral argument.