History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bentley v. Pendleton
105 Ohio St. 3d 326
Ohio
2005
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 104 Ohio St.3d 599, 2004-Ohio-7103, 821 N.E.2d 154, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error and for further proceedings not inconsistent with Gilchrist v. Gonsor.

Robert W. Kerpsack Co., L.P.A, and Robert W. Kerpsack, for appellants. Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., L.P.A., Michael L. Close, and Dale D. Cook; Janik & Dorman, L.L.P., Stacy Lilly, and Matthew Grimm, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.





Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} For reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 104 Ohio St.3d 599, 2004-Ohio-7103, 821 N.E.2d 154, ¶ 14-23, I respectfully dissent.

Lanzinger, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Bentley v. Pendleton
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 4, 2005
Citation: 105 Ohio St. 3d 326
Docket Number: No. 2004-1135
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.