Bentick v. GatchalianBentick v. Gatchalian
Versions:147 A.D.3d 89048 N.Y.S.3d 1712017 NY Slip Op 011722017 NY Slip Op 1172
Hobart v. Allstate Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. is mentioned in the first page but the OCR starts mid-case. The next complete case starts with “Cathleen Bentick, Respondent, v Fernando Gatchalian, Appellant“. However, looking at the OCR, the first snippet is from an Allstate case that seems to be the end of one case, and then starts a new case “Cathleen Bentick...“. Wait, the second case “Cathleen Bentick” starts on page 1 and continues to page 3. Then another case “Henry Boring...” starts on page 3. Following the instruction: “For multi-opinion documents, convert only the MAIN opinion — the one with a complete case caption and full opinion body. Skip partial content from a previous case that appears at the beginning of the document.” The main complete opinion here is Cathleen Bentick v Fernando Gatchalian. I will skip the partial Allstate content at the top of page 1 and the Henry Boring case at the bottom of page 3.
Wait, looking at page 1, the text “Cathleen Bentick, Respondent, v Fernando Gatchalian, Appellant. [48 NYS3d 171]—” is the caption for the case that follows. The text starting on page 1 “In an action to recover damages...” belongs to this case.
Let‘s re-evaluate the Allstate text. It starts with “890 the defendant Amy M. Kott...“. It looks like the end of an opinion. I will skip it.
Main opinion:
Case Name: Cathleen Bentick v. Fernando Gatchalian
Short Name: Bentick v. Gatchalian
Citation: 147 AD3d 890 (implied by page number 890, but let‘s check the citation provided in text: [48 NYS3d 171])
Court: N.Y. App. Div. (Second Department)
Date: Since it cites 2016 cases and the order appealed from is 2015, the decision date is likely 2017 (Bentick v Gatchalian, 147 AD3d 890, 48 NYS3d 171 [2d Dept 2017]).
Docket: Not provided in text, but I will extract metadata from what is visible.
Actually, the page number 890 is at the top left. The Allstate case ends on 890. The Bentick case starts on 890.
The Allstate case text: “... Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.”
Then: “Cathleen Bentick, Respondent, v Fernando Gatchalian, Appellant. [48 NYS3d 171]—”
The Bentick opinion starts after this line.
The Henry Boring case starts at the bottom of 892.
So I will convert the Bentick v Gatchalian case.
Short Name: Bentick v. Gatchalian
Court: N.Y. App. Div. (actually “Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department“)
Citation: 147 AD3d 890 | 48 NYS3d 171
Date: No explicit decision date for the appellate order in the text, only the date of the order appealed from (December 10, 2015). However, typically I should use the date provided. If it‘s missing, I‘ll omit the attribute or use what I can infer. The text mentions 2016 cases in citations, so it‘s 2016 or 2017. I‘ll stick to what‘s in the text.
Wait, page 1 OCR: “the defendant Amy M. Kott... Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.”
Then “Cathleen Bentick, Respondent, v Fernando Gatchalian, Appellant. [48 NYS3d 171]—”
Then “In an action to recover damages...”
Let‘s process “Bentick v. Gatchalian“.
Case Info:
Name: Cathleen Bentick, Respondent, v Fernando Gatchalian, Appellant.
Short Name: Bentick v. Gatchalian
Citation: 147 AD3d 890 | 48 NYS3d 171
Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department (inferred from page headers/reporter type, though not explicitly in full on the page snippet, but the judges are listed at the end of the previous case and the current case).
Date: 2017 (inferred from citation context, but not in text). I will omit date if not clearly on the page.
Metadata extraction:
Case Name: Cathleen Bentick, Respondent, v Fernando Gatchalian, Appellant.
Citation: 147 AD3d 890 | 48 NYS3d 171
Court: App. Div.
Docket: None.
Note: The judges for the Allstate case (Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ.) are likely the same