Thе defendant, Fred Benson, appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Lieutenant Donnie Chavous of the Richmond County Police Department received a telephone cаll on March 19, 1983, from an informant *136 he had known for approximately five years. The informant hаd previously given him and other members of the police information which had led to arrests. He testified that “all the information that I have ever received from him has been true and correct.” The informant advised him that Fred Benson was at Oak Village, a housing complex in Augusta. He was at the home of Lawrence King, a known dealer in drugs. Benson was driving a blue Volkswаgen Rabbit with South Carolina plates. The informant said that Benson was in possession of cocaine which had been hidden in a key lock box under the bumper. Lt. Chavous did not have time to get a search warrant, but he and three other detectives drove immediately to the Oak Village housing complex. As they entered they saw Benson leaving, driving a blue VW Rabbit with South Carolina license plates. Det. Chavous turned and followed Benson until he could stop the сar. Chavous searched under the front bumper and removed a black magnetic key box. The box contained approximately 10 to 11 grams of cocaine. Benson was placed under arrest and he was “patted down.” Benson had four syringes in his right pants pocket. A search was made of the car he was driving. Two straws were found in the car’s glove compartment. The straws had a white powder residue in them. Testing confirmed that it was cocaine. A package of razor blades was found in the car along with a set of plastic scales. A detective testified that razor blades are used for cutting up cocaine and placing the cocaine in a line so that it can be “snorted” through straws by clоsing one nostril. He also testified to converting powdered cocaine into a liquid by hеating it and using a syringe to inject it into the bloodstream.
Benson testified that he lives in South Carolinа and the VW belongs to his wife. He had never seen the cocaine before the offiсer found it underneath his car’s bumper. Neither does he know where the straws came from. His daughter sometimes uses straws to drink soft drinks. He purchased the syringes for his sister who is a diabetic. The scales belonged to King and he was not aware of his reputation as a drug dealer. Benson brings this appeal from his conviction before a jury. Held:
The defendant’s sole enumeration of error is that there was “no direct evidence that the appellant was the owner of the drug . . . but the undisputed evidence shows that several persons had equal аccess to said drug.” We find this argument unpersuasive. This Court addressed the same issue in
Fears v. State,
Although the remaining evidence is circumstantial, a jury issue was formed and we will not substitute our judgment for that of the jury. “The rule as tо the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence to support a conviction is that the evidence exclude every reasonable hypothesis except the guilt of thе accused, not that , it removes every possibility of his innocence.”
Baldwin v. State,
Judgment affirmed.