Benson v. SelskyBenson v. Selsky
Petitioner commenced this
The misbehavior report, as amplified by hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it, relates that petitioner went after another inmate with a mop stick and then, ignoring numerous orders from the officer to stop, proceeded to exchange punches with the inmate. The foregoing constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Chavis v Goord, 45 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2007]). To the extent that petitioner offered exculpatory statements, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Vigliotti v Selsky, 45 AD3d 946, 946-947 [2007]). Petitioner‘s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied an impartial hearing, have been considered and found to be unavailing.
Cardona, P.J., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.