149 Ga. 555 | Ga. | 1919
1. Where, as a part of the consideration for the purchase-price of land, the vendee assumed the debts of the vendor for which there were outstanding deeds to secure such debts, a positive statement by the vendor to the vendee that the debts aggregated “$6,000, whereas the amount of such debts was $7,500, was a misstatement of a material fact; and whether or not at the time of the making of the misstatement the vendor knew it to be such, if the vendee in good faith believed the statement of the vendor to be true, and acted upon it to his injury, such misstatement so acted upon, with the result stated, would be sufficient ground for a petition by the grantee to cancel the deed. Civil Code, § 4113; Smith v. Mitchell, 6 Ga. 458; Reese v. Wyman, 9 Ga. 430 (7); Bailey v. Jones, 14 Ga. 384 (4); Woodruff v. Saul, 70 Ga. 273; Newman v. Claflin, 107 Ga. 94 (32 S. E. 943).
(a) The fact that the outstanding security deed and mortgage may have been matters of public record would not affect the case. The vendee, believing the representations as to the amount due oh the debts secured by the encumbrance, had the right to rely upon the positive statement of the vendor as to the amount due thereon.
2. The allegation in the petition, that, “upon learning” of the misrepresentation of- the vendor, the vendee applied to the vendor to have the deed canceled, and that the vendor promised to do so, but had failed to move in the matter, otherwise than to request the vendee to bring an action himself to have the instrument canceled, was sufficient as against a general demurrer complaining that it did not appear that the action was commenced promptly after the discovery of the misrepresentation.
3. The deed was dated March 3, 1916, and, after the granting elause, contained the following: “This deed is made to [the grantee] in trust for the following uses and trusts, to wit: (1) To collect the rents od
4. It was error to dismiss the petition on general demurrer.
Judgment reversed.