History
  • No items yet
midpage
77 So. 3d 174
Ala. Crim. App.
2011

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

WELCH, P.J., and WINDOM, BURKE, and JOINER, JJ., concur. KELLUM, J., concurs specially, with opinion.





Concurrence Opinion

KELLUM, Judge,

concurring specially.

I write specially to note that this action appears to be Jerry Dale Bennett’s seventh Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition challenging his 1995 guilty-plea conviction for capital murder. I believe that allowing Bennett to file multiple petitions for post-conviction relief in which his claims are either precluded or without merit wastes scarce judicial resources. Therefore, I would encourage the circuit court to consider adopting sanctions like those proposed in Peoples v. State, 581 So.2d 323 (Ala.Crim.App.1988), and Procup v. Strickland, 792 F.2d 1069 (11th Cir.1986), to prevent future frivolous litigation on the part of Bennett and other similarly situated inmates. See Ex parte Thompson, 38 So.3d 119 (Ala.Crim.App.2009).

Case Details

Case Name: Bennett v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: May 27, 2011
Citations: 77 So. 3d 174; 2011 WL 2094781; 2011 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 34; CR-10-0498
Docket Number: CR-10-0498
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In