midpage

Bennett v. HuckeBennett v. Hucke

New York Court of Appeals
Aug 30, 2016
Versions:28 N.Y.3d 964
60 N.E.3d 1200
38 N.Y.S.3d 834
2016 NY Slip Op 05904

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether defendants-respondents Alan Kirk et al. are subject to general contractor liability for when James Bennett was injured.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Case Details

Case Name: Bennett v. Hucke
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 30, 2016
Citations: 28 N.Y.3d 964; 60 N.E.3d 1200; 38 N.Y.S.3d 834; 2016 NY Slip Op 05904
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In