History
  • No items yet
midpage
Benedict v. Bonebrake
253 Pa. 348
Pa.
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The judgment of the court below is so manifestly correct that counsel for appellant, when his appeal was called in this court, stated he would not attempt to argue that it was wrong.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Benedict v. Bonebrake
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 17, 1916
Citation: 253 Pa. 348
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 431
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.