History
  • No items yet
midpage
Benedict v. Beebee
11 Johns. 145
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1814
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plaintiff having expressly abandoned all claim for damages for a breach of the contract as to the farm, all objections as to the statute of frauds are removed. A promise or undertaking by the defendant to pay the plaintiff for the improvements made by the deienxfant on the land, is not void under the statute. It was so decided by this court in the case of Freer v. Hardenbergh. (5 Johns. Rep. 272.)

The judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Benedict v. Beebee
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1814
Citation: 11 Johns. 145
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.