Case Information
*1 Mark E. Merin (State Bar No. 043849)
Paul H. Masuhara (State Bar No. 289805) L AW O FFICE OF M ARK E. M ERIN
1010 F Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 443-6911
Facsimile: (916) 447-8336
E-Mail: mark@markmerin.com
paul@markmerin.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff MANUEL BENCOMO
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
cfessenden@porterscott.com Suli A. Mastorakos, SBN 330383
smastorakos@porterscott.com 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, California 95815
TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT JONES, and MATHEW MORENO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
MANUEL BENCOMO, Case No. 2:23-cv-0440-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: PERSONNEL FILES; vs. [PROPOSED] ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.
STIPULATION
A. PURPOSE AND LIMITATION
Defendants believe that the disclosure and discovery activity concerning the materials described in this stipulated protective order is likely to involve production of information for which protection from public disclosure would be warranted. Plaintiff has not been permitted to view the materials described in this stipulated protective order. The parties acknowledge that this protective order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or discovery activity, and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to such protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The parties further acknowledge that this stipulated protective order does not entitle any party to file information designated as protected or confidential under seal, where Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the Court to file material under seal.
B. DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall apply to this Protective Order: The “Action” shall mean and refer to the above-captioned matter and to all actions now or later consolidated with the Action, and any appeal from the Action and from any other action consolidated at any time under the above-captioned matter, through final judgment. “Documents” or “Confidential Documents” shall mean the documents that Defendants
designate as “Confidential” and described in section C. “Confidential” shall mean information designated “Confidential” pursuant to this
stipulated protective order. Information designated “Confidential” shall be information that is determined in good faith by the attorneys representing the designating party to be subject to protection pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Confidential documents, material, and/or information shall be used solely for purposes of litigation. Confidential information shall not be used by the non-designating party for any business or other purpose, unless agreed to in writing by all parties to this action or as authorized by further order of the Court. “Defendants” shall mean the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT JONES, and MATHEW MORENO. *3 1 5. “Plaintiff” shall mean MANUEL BENCOMO.
2 6. “Parties” shall mean Plaintiff and Defendants, identified above.
3 C. INFORMATION COVERED
4 Covered Information:
5 Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(1), a description of the information eligible for protection under 6 this stipulated protective order is limited to the following:
7 1. Personnel Files of Mathew Moreno:
8 i. Employment Records 1. Mathew Moreno Deputy Sheriff Appointment (DEF 02085)
9 2. Department Seniority Determination Worksheet (DEF 02086) 10 3. New Employee Masterfile New Hire (DEF 02383) 11
4. Class/Status Change Masterfile Promotion (DEF 02087) 12 5. Notice of Appointment/Termination (DEF 02088) 13 6. Email authorizing Dep. Moreno to receive K9 stipend (DEF 02089) 14 7. Employment Uniform Expense Documents (DEF 02094 – 02100, 02363 – 02366) 15 8. Sac County Employees’ Retirement System Correspondence (DEF 02106 -
16 02109 17
9. DMV Request for Confidentiality of Home Address (DEF 02115) 18 10. Subpoena Assignment Receipts (DEF 02125, 02174, 02178, 02182, 02190, 19 02194, 02196, 02221, 02236 – 02237, 02245, 02266, 02268 – 02269, 20 02285 – 02286, 02319, 02322, 02329, 02358, 02370, 02372, 02376, 02380, 02398, 02404, 02429) 21 11. Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Employee Feedback Forms (DEF
22 02137, 02154, 02391) 23 Division Losing/Gaining Employee w/ Personnel Orders (DEF 02166 –
24 02170, 02416 - 02417)
25 SCSD Employee Status/History – Notices of Address Change (DEF 02195, 26 02296, 02308, 02328, 02331)
27 SCSD Employee Status/History – New Employee (DEF 02292) SCSD Pre-Employment Releases and Waivers (DEF 02210, 02289) 28 *4 1 16. SCSD Inter-Department Correspondence RE Field Training Officer Appointment and Incentive Pay (DEF 02279) 2 17. Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verifications (DEF 02309, 02340) 3 18. Non-Sworn Hiring Clearance Form (DEF 02334) 4
19. County of Sacramento Employment Statement Signed (DEF 02335) 5 20. County of Sacramento Last Warrant Designee (DEF 02336) 6 21. SCSD Section 15630 Welfare and Institutions Code Agreement Signed 7 (DEF 02338) 22. Employee Self-Identification Questionnaire (DEF 02339)
8 23. SCSD Use of Criminal Justice Information Compliance Agreement Signed 9 (DEF 02341 – 02342)
10 SCSD Work Schedule/Supervisor Change Requests (DEF 02378, 02409)
11 ii. Employee Time and Attendance Management
12 Absence Requests (DEF 02079, 02083 – 02084, 02093, 02104, 02110 – 13 02112, 02114, 02118 – 02119, 02122 – 02123, 02126, 02128, 02143, 02148 – 02150, 02164 – 02165, 02171, 02179 – 02180, 02185, 02187, 14 02191 – 021921, 2197, 02199 – 02200, 02202, 02207, 02209, 02211, 15 02217 – 02219, 02223, 02226 – 02227, 02230, 02234, 02244, 02255, 16
02260, 02263, 02270, 02274 – 02276, 02278, 02283, 02288, 02290, 02295, 17 02305 – 02306, 02313 – 02314, 02325, 02327, 02330, 02343 – 02344, 18 02346, 02349, 02353 – 02354, 02359, 02373, 02375, 02379, 02381 – 19 02382, 02394, 02410, 02418, 02427, 02433 – 02435, 02438 – 02439) 20 Employee Time Sheet Correction Forms (DEF 02090, 02172, 02176, 02184, 02186, 02188, 02201, 02203, 02205, 02208, 02220, 02228, 02235, 21 02246, 02273, 02281, 02315, 02320, 02324, 02357, 02367, 02374, 02403, 22 02431, 02437) 23 Records of Overtime Worked (DEF 02091 – 02092, 02105, 02113, 02116
24 – 02117, 02120 – 02121, 02129 – 02131, 02138 – 02139, 02141 – 02142, 25 02145, 02147, 02152, 02162 – 02163, 02173, 02177, 02181, 02183, 02189, 26 02193, 02198, 02204, 02206, 02222, 02224, 02229, 02231 – 02233, 02238 – 02243, 02247, 02256 – 02259, 02261 – 02262, 02264 – 02265, 02282, 27 02284, 02287, 02293 – 02294, 02302 – 02304, 02311 – 02312, 02316 – 28 *5 1 02318, 02321, 02323, 02326, 02345, 02347 – 02348, 02351 – 02352, 02355 – 02356, 02361 – 02362, 02368 – 02369, 02371, 02377, 02389 – 2 02390, 02393, 02395, 02397, 02399 – 02400, 02405 – 02407, 02420 – 3 02425, 02428, 02432) 4
4. Cross Application Timesheets (DEF 02080 – 02082, 02127, 02151, 02153, 5 02175, 02225, 02267, 02272, 02277, 02280, 02291, 02307, 02350, 02360, 6 02396, 02401 – 02402)
7 5. Request for Parental Leave (DEF 02101 – 02103) iii. Payroll/Wages 8 1. Fax to Sac County from Vendor Services RE Verification of Mathew
9 Moreno Employment & Salary (DEF 02297) 10 2. Request for Verification of Employment (DEF 02298 – 02299)
11 3. Authorization to Obtain and Release Credit Information (DEF 02300) 12 4. County of Sacramento Payroll History Information (03/2015) (DEF 02301) 13 5. EDD Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate (DEF 02384 – 02385) 14 6. County of Sacramento Direct Deposit Enrollment Authorization (DEF
15 02386) 16
7. SCSD Incentive Pay Applications (DEF 02248, 02387) 17 8. SCSD Incentive Pay Request for Rep Units 003 & 029 (DEF 02392) 18 9. County of Sacramento Inter-Department Correspondence RE Part-Time 19 Training Officer Pay (DEF 02426)
20 iv. Evaluations/Awards 1. Performance Evaluation Reports (DEF 02132 – 02136, 02156 – 02161,
21 02212 – 02216, 02411 – 02415) 22 SSD Inter-Departmental Correspondence Letter RE Awarding Major
23
Incident Ribbon, Dep. Robert French (DEF 02140) 24 Bronze Star of Bravery Certificate (DEF 02144) 25 SSD Inter-Departmental Correspondence Letter RE Awarding Major 26 Incident Ribbon, Tara O’Sullivan (DEF 2271) v. Education 27 Sacramento State BS Criminal Justice Certificate (DEF 02251, 02388)
28 *6 Sacramento State Transcript (DEF 02252 – 02253) Sierra College Transcript (DEF 02254) Particularized Need for Protection:
Pursuant to Local Rule141.1(c)(2), Defendants assert that there exists a specific, particularized need for protection as to the information covered by this stipulated protective order. Defendants represented to the Court and Plaintiff that the materials designated to be covered by this stipulated protective order are limited solely to those which would qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and does not include information designated on a blanket or indiscriminate basis. See , e.g. , In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland , 661 F.3d 417, 424 (9th Cir. 2011).
Showing of Need for a Protective Order:
Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(3), protection afforded by this stipulated protective order is for the convenience of Defendants and the Court. Defendants seek to avoid litigation and expenditure of resources concerning a potential motion for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The entry of this stipulated protective order may prevent the parties and the Court from conducting the usual document-by-document analysis necessary to obtain protection, in favor of a procedure whereby presumptive protection is afforded based on Defendants’ good faith representations of the need for protection. See , e.g. , Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. , 785 F.2d 1108, 1122 (3d Cir. 1986) (“[T]he burden of justifying the confidentiality of each and every document sought to be covered by a protective order remains on the party seeking the protective order; any other conclusion would turn Rule 26(c) on its head.”). As a result, production may be made with this stipulated protective order in place and, if necessary, it will permit discrete and narrowed challenges to documents designated for protection. D. TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER
Confidential Documents subject to protection may be designated as “Confidential” and produced subject to this stipulated protective order: The Confidential documents shall be used solely in connection with the above-captioned
civil case, and in the preparation and trial of the case. The parties do not waive any objections to the admissibility of the documents or portions thereof in future proceedings in this case, including trial. The parties will designate the Confidential documents as confidential by affixing a mark *7 labelling them “Confidential.” The Confidential documents may only be disclosed to the following persons:
a. Plaintiff, Mark E. Merin and Paul H. Masuhara of the Law Office of Mark E.
Merin, and any partners and associates in that office;
b. Defendants, Carl L. Fessenden and Suli A. Mastorakos of Porter Scott, and any partners and associates in that office;
c. Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel or support staff regularly employed by counsel referred to in subparts (a) and (b) immediately above, including stenographic deposition reporters or videographers retained in connection with this action;
d. Court personnel, including stenographic reporters or videographers engaged in proceedings as are necessarily incidental to the preparation for the trial in the civil action;
e. Any expert, consultant, or investigator retained in connection with this action; however, such persons must be advised of and abide by this protective order;
f. The finder of facts at the time of trial, subject to the court’s rulings on in limine motions and objections of counsel; and
g. Witnesses during their depositions in this action. If confidential documents are used in the deposition, the documents must be identified as “Confidential” and the portion of the deposition in which the documents are described should also be considered confidential. Information covered by this stipulated protective order does not automatically entitle the
parties to file such information or documents with the Court under seal. Any request to seal documents is governed by Local Rule 141. If the Confidential documents are filed with any motion or other pleading, a party may seek permission from the Court to file the Confidential Documents under seal according to Local Rule 141. If permission is granted, the Confidential documents will be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 141. The designation of the Confidential documents as “Confidential” and the subsequent
production thereof is without prejudice to the right of any party to oppose the admissibility of the Confidential documents or information contained therein. Any party or non-party may challenge a Confidential designation at any time. A party or
*8 non-party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. The challenging party shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in person or voice-to-voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) within seven (7) days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the challenging party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the designating party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the designating party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner. If the parties cannot resolve a challenge without Court intervention, the designating party shall file and serve a motion for protective order/to retain confidentiality pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and Local Rule 251 within twenty-one (21) days of the initial notice of challenge or within seven (7) days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is earlier. Failure by the designating party to make such a motion within twenty-one (21) days (or seven (7) days, if applicable) shall automatically waive the “Confidential” designation for each challenged designation. In addition, the challenging party may file a motion challenging a confidentiality designation at any time if there is good cause for doing so. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the designating party, consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Unless the designating party has waived the confidentiality designation by failing to file a motion for protective order/to retain confidentiality as described above, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the designating party’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge. Should the Confidential documents or any information contained therein be disclosed, through inadvertence or otherwise, to any person not authorized to receive it under this stipulated protective order, the disclosing person(s) shall promptly (a) inform counsel for the Defendants of the recipient(s) and the circumstances of the unauthorized disclosure to the relevant producing person(s) and *9 (b) use best efforts to bind the recipient(s) to the terms of this stipulated protective order.
8. The Confidential documents shall not lose its confidential status because it was inadvertently or unintentionally disclosed to a person not authorized to receive it under this stipulated protective order.
9. The protections conferred by this stipulated protective order cover the information defined above, as well as any information copied from the materials. However, the protections conferred by this stipulated protective order do not cover: (A) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure or which subsequently becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (B) any information known prior to the disclosure or obtained after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality. After the conclusion of this litigation, the Confidential documents will remain
confidential. “Conclusion” of this litigation means a termination of the case following a trial, settlement, or dismissal of the action with prejudice for any other reason. This stipulated protective order shall remain in full force and effect and shall continue to
be binding on all parties and affected persons until this litigation terminates, subject to any subsequent modifications of this stipulated protective order for good cause shown by this Court or any Court having jurisdiction over an appeal of this action. Upon termination of this litigation, the parties agree the stipulated protective order shall continue in force as a private agreement between the parties. The parties may request additional records to be subject to this stipulated protective order.
If a party believes a document to be produced should be subject to this stipulated protective order, the parties must meet and confer. If there is agreement, the parties shall submit an amendment to this stipulated protective order to identify the additional documents. If the parties cannot agree, the party seeking protection shall file a motion for protective order pursuant to the terms of Local Rule 251. During the pendency of this lawsuit, the Court may (a) make such amendments, modifications, and/or additions to this stipulated protective order as deemed appropriate upon good cause shown; and (b) adjudicate any dispute arising under it.
/ / / *10 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: March 22, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,
L AW O FFICE OF M ARK E. M ERIN /s/Paul H. Masuhara (Authorized on 3/21/24) By: __________________________________ Mark E. Merin Paul H. Masuhara Attorneys for Plaintiff MANUEL BENCOMO Dated: Mach 22, 2024 Respectfully Submitted,
/s/ Suli A. Mastorakos By: __________________________________ Carl L. Fessenden Suli A. Mastorakos Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT JONES, and MATHEW MORENO
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulated protective order is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED .
Dated : April 4, 2024 JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
