History
  • No items yet
midpage
Belser v. State
16 Ala. App. 504
Ala. Ct. App.
1918
Check Treatment

No brief has come to the hands of the court. Charge __________ requested in writing by the defendant is abstract and does not assert the true rule as to the burden of proof. Charge 1 is entirely abstract. The correct proposition of law applicable to this case was fully and clearly stated in the oral charge of the court. Charge 2 does not state a correct proposition of law as applied to the testimony of accomplices as provided in section 7897, Code 1907. The test of complicity is: Could the witness be indicted for the offense either as principal or accessory? If not, he is competent. Bass v. State,37 Ala. 469. An accessory after the fact is a separate and distinct offense, made so by section 6220 of the Code of 1907.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Belser v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 4, 1918
Citation: 16 Ala. App. 504
Docket Number: 3 Div. 326.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.