History
  • No items yet
midpage
Belmont Homes, Inc. v. Kreutzer
1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5966
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1958
|
Check Treatment

In an action for (1) a judgment declaring unauthorized a resolution with respect to the construction of water facilities in a new development and the charges established by the resolution unenforcible, (2) an injunction against the enforcement of the resolution, and (3) for an accounting of money deposited, a judgment was entered after trial granting a limited accounting but dismissing the complaint in all other respects. The appeal is from so much of the judgment as dismissed the complaint “in all other respects”. Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion plaintiff was not coerced in entering into the agreement but did so voluntarily and, having benefited therefrom, is estopped from questioning its validity. (Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of City of New York v. Sonneborn, 113 N. Y. 423; City of Buffalo v. Balcom, 134 N. Y. 532; City of New York v. Delli Paoli, 202 N. Y. 18.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Belmont Homes, Inc. v. Kreutzer
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 12, 1958
Citation: 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5966
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.