Belmark Restaurant v. Hooker
220 So. 2d 624
Fla.1969Check TreatmentBy petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 7, 1969.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is, therefore, denied.
The petition for attorney’s fees is granted in the sum of $250.00 to respondent-Clora Hooker’s attorney.