History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bellas v. Pardoe
2 Monag. 351
Pa.
1888
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

A careful examination of this case satisfies us that the plaintiff in error has nothing of which he ought to complain.

The case was one principally of facts which, under proper instructions, were submitted to the jury. It follows that none of the assignments of error can be sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bellas v. Pardoe
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 1, 1888
Citation: 2 Monag. 351
Docket Number: No. 100
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.