| Superior Court of New Hampshire | Dec 15, 1845
The court cannot amend a statement of facts, agreed to by the parties, on motion of one of the parties. The parties make their own agreements, and the ’ court cannot alter them. The only relief which the court can grant, when it appears that a decision upon the facts
In order to justify us in interfering in that mode, it must appear that the agreement has been entered into under some misapprehension of the facts, or that new facts have been discovered since the agreement, material to the party’s case; that due diligence was used in the preparation of the case, and due care and caution exercised in entering into the agreement.
If, under such circumstances, it appears that the rights of'the party will be concluded and sacrificed, should he be held bound by the agreement, and that injustice will thus be done, the court may order the case to be discharged, upon motion of one party, on such terms as may appear reasonable for the indemnity of his adversary.
But we are of opinion that the affidavit in support of this motion does not bring the case within the rule for such interference.
The court sometimes discharges a case agreed, after an opinion has been delivered, upon evidence showing the existence of other facts, which may be material, in order to give the party an opportunity to amend. The case is sometimes set aside on the terms that the party shall give judgment by agreement, open to review. But this is only done upon evidence showing that something appearing to be material has been omitted (which fact may appear for the first time from the opinion of the court), and that there has been no laches.