History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern
129 Ohio St. 463
Ohio
1935
Check Treatment

It is ordered and decreed that the judgment of the Court of Appeals be, and the same hereby is, affirmed upon the unambiguous provisions of Sections 1465-31, 5611-1, 5611-2 and 5609, General Code, and upon the authority of State, ex rel.Ohio Bell Telephone Co., v. Court of Common Pleas of CuyahogaCounty, 128 Ohio St. 553, 192 N.E. 787; State, ex rel.Bettman, Atty. Genl., v. Court of Common Pleas of FranklinCounty, 124 Ohio St. 269, 178 N.E. 258, 78 A. L. R., 1079, and State, ex rel. Tax Commission of Ohio, v. Faust, Aud.,113 Ohio St. 365, 149 N.E. 197.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bell v. State Ex Rel. Methodist Book Concern
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 8, 1935
Citation: 129 Ohio St. 463
Docket Number: 25289
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.