History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bell v. State
731 So. 2d 85
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1999
Check Treatment
NORTHCUTT, Judge.

On the merits we affirm Maurice Bell’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written judgment and sentence. See Fenn v. State, 702 So.2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Notwithstanding the trial court’s dismissal of two counts of attempted murder and one count of shooting into a vehicle, the judgment and sentence reflect convictions on these counts as well as on the single count of attempted first degree murder for which the jury found Bell guilty. On remand the trial court shall delete from the judgment and sentence any reference to counts 2, 3, and 4.

Remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J„ Concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bell v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 7, 1999
Citation: 731 So. 2d 85
Docket Number: No. 97-02642
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.