midpage

Bell v. New York City Transit AuthorityBell v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Court of Appeals
Jan 17, 2006
Versions:6 N.Y.3d 770
844 N.E.2d 788
811 N.Y.S.2d 333
2006 N.Y. LEXIS 77

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellants, having stipulated to an increase in damages at Supreme Court, are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511; see Plotkin v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 88 NY2d 917 [1996]).

Case Details

Case Name: Bell v. New York City Transit Authority
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 17, 2006
Citations: 6 N.Y.3d 770; 844 N.E.2d 788; 811 N.Y.S.2d 333; 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 77
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In