History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bell v. English
4 Cranch 332
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1834
Check Treatment
THE COURT

(nem. con.) refused to discharge the boy, being of opinion that the orphans’ court had jurisdiction to bind out orphan children; and that the binding was in the usual form in which that court exercised its jurisdiction. See Hines v. Hewitt, [Case No. 6,520.]

Case Details

Case Name: Bell v. English
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Oct 15, 1834
Citation: 4 Cranch 332
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.