History
  • No items yet
midpage
Belknap v. Tremble
2 Paige Ch. 277
New York Court of Chancery
1830
Check Treatment
The Chancellor

said the intention of that part of the rule was to have appeal causes placed on the calendar as of the same date at which they were placed on the calendar of the court below. That on an appeal from a vice chancellor’s decree, the matter was to be considered as having arisen at the time when the bill was taken as confessed, or the plea, answer, demurrer, or replication was filed in the court below. And on appeals from the sentences of decrees of surrogates, *278or of circuit' judges in testamentary cases, the matter was to be considered as having arisen at the time of the litis contestado, or joining of the issue, or other analogous proceeding before the surrogate.

Case Details

Case Name: Belknap v. Tremble
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: May 25, 1830
Citation: 2 Paige Ch. 277
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.