History
  • No items yet
midpage
Belknap v. Ives
1 How. Pr. 218
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1845
Check Treatment

Notice of motion given for the first Tuesday of August, held bad, a new notice should have been given for the September term. The new rules having abolished the August term.

H. Wilkes, defendant’s attorney, for motion.—The court refused to allow this motion to be taken by default, because the notice of motion was for the first Tuesday of August. A new notice should have been given for the September term.

Case Details

Case Name: Belknap v. Ives
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 15, 1845
Citation: 1 How. Pr. 218
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.