History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beissell v. Sholl
4 Dall. 211
SCOTUS
1800
Check Treatment
4 U.S. 211 (____)
4 Dall. 211

Beissell
versus
Sholl.[(1)]
Wagoner
versus
Same.

Supreme Court of United States.

CASE, for diverting a water course. The COURT left the facts to the jury, under this general statement of the law: "That every man, in this country, has an unquestionable right, "to erect a mill upon his own land; and to use the water, passing "through his land, as he pleases: subject only to this limitation, "that his mill must not be so constructed and employed, "as to injure his neighbour's mill; and that, after using the "water, he returns the stream to its ancient channel."

NOTES

[(1)] Tried in the Circuit Court, Northampton county, June 1800, before SHIPPEN, C.J. and YEATES, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Beissell v. Sholl
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 1, 1800
Citation: 4 Dall. 211
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.