151 Minn. 478 | Minn. | 1922
Plaintiff, while riding a motor cycle on a street in Rochester, came into collision with defendant’s track' and was injured. He sued for damages and recovered a verdict. Defendant appeals.
Defendant on argument complained that the court did not submit to the jury the question whether the driver was acting in the course of his employment at the time of the accident. No exception was taken to the charge in the trial court. Objections to the charge raised for the first time on argument before this court clearly come too late.
Order affirmed.