History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beekman v. Peck
3 Johns. Ch. 415
New York Court of Chancery
1818
Check Treatment
The Chancellor

was of opinion that the application in the shape of a petition was not indispensable, and that the plaintiff, by means of the previous notice and service of copies of the papers, had all the requisite information. - The motion was granted, on payment of the costs of the default and subsequent proceedings; and the injunction, which had been made perpetual in the decree, by default, was continued until farther order.

Case Details

Case Name: Beekman v. Peck
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Aug 18, 1818
Citation: 3 Johns. Ch. 415
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.