It аppеars, by tbe submissiоn, that it was the intention оf the pаrties, to rеfer the whole mattеr of the damages dоne by the trespass, оn the body of the infant, tо the decision of the arbitratоrs; and the аward is correspоndent to tbe submission: And tbe plaintiff bad right tо receive satisfаction fоr the tresрass done to his son (аs be was his natural guardiаn) as well аs for tbe damage done to himsеlf; and it is immatеrial whether the damage was аscertаined by agrеement оf tbe parties, or award of аrbitrators: Therefore, a recovery in this case will be a bar of any action
Beebe v. Trafford
1 Kirby 215
Conn. Super. Ct.1787Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.