History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bedgood v. Floyd
93 S.E. 218
Ga. Ct. App.
1917
Check Treatment
George, J.

This was a statutory motion to set aside a judgment. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4358, 5958. It is essential to the validity of such .a motion that it affirmatively appear that the motion was presented to the judge and filed in term time. It affirmatively appears, from the record that the motion was presented to the judge of the superior court at chambers, and the bill of exceptions recites that it was “made in vacation after the court had adjourned.” Having been begun in vacation, the proceeding was a nullity, and the judge of the superior court had no authority to entertain the motion. See Malsby v. Studstill, 127 Ga. 726, 728 (56 S. E. 988), and cases there cited. The order denying the motion will be construed as an order dismissing it; and, for the reason stated, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Bedgood v. Floyd
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 25, 1917
Citation: 93 S.E. 218
Docket Number: 8671
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.