History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bedford v. Rice
58 N.H. 446
N.H.
1878
Check Treatment

The plaintiff town having chosen no health officers, the selectmen were, by law, such officers. Gen. St., c. 37, s. 4. In case of a vacancy in the office the selectmen could appoint. Gen. St., c. 39, s. 1. By appointing others to the office the selectmen resigned it, and a vacancy existed which was filled by the appointment.

It was sufficient that the persons appointed were health officers de facto. They were not parties to the suit, and the rights of the public and third persons were in question, and the title to the office could not be contested in this case. Tucker v. Aiken, 7 N.H. 113, 131; Blake v. Sturtevant, 12 N.H. 573; Carr v. Dodge, 40 N.H. 403, 409; Prescott v. Hayes, 42 N.H. 56, 58; State v. Carroll, 38 Conn. 449; Brown v. O'Connell,36 Conn. 432.

Exception overruled.

STANLEY and CLARK, JJ., did not sit. *Page 447

Case Details

Case Name: Bedford v. Rice
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Aug 5, 1878
Citation: 58 N.H. 446
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.