History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beckley v. Boardman
6 Conn. 372
Conn.
1827
Check Treatment
By the Court:

No rule will be made upon the officer in this case. But if he had notice not to pay the money over to Boardman, and has, notwithstanding such notice, made payment, the plaintiff in error may sustain indebitalus assumpsit against him for the money. If he paid it over without notice, the plaintiff in error is without redress as against him.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Beckley v. Boardman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jun 15, 1827
Citation: 6 Conn. 372
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.