History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bechtold v. Stillwagon
119 Misc. 177
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1922
Check Treatment
Cropsey, J.

Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the directors of the defendant corporation from retiring him from his position as treasurer. His contention is that he was elected treasurer by the stockholders and, therefore, cannot be removed by the directors. The by-laws provide for the election of a treasurer and other officers by the vote of the stockholders. But the statute says that the directors of a stock corporation may appoint a treasurer and other officers. Stock Corp. Law, § 30. Every corporation is given power to make by-laws, but they must be “ not inconsistent with any existing law” (Gen. Corp. Law, § 11, subd. 5); a by-law that is so incon*178sistent is invalid (Matter of Keogh, Inc., 192 App. Div. 624, 630; Raub v. Gerken, 127 id. 42); as the power to elect a treasurer is by statute given to the directors, the power to remove him must likely be lodged with them. See People ex rel. Manice v. Powell, 201 N. Y. 194. The provision of the by-laws is ineffective. This action is not brought under section 172 of the General Corporation Law. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Ordered accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: Bechtold v. Stillwagon
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 15, 1922
Citation: 119 Misc. 177
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.