Beceiro-Mesa v. StateBeceiro-Mesa v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Ferguson
The defendant was сonvicted by a jury of aggravated bаttery and carrying a concealed firearm. Both of these crimes were committed prior to the adоption of the sentencing guidelines. Thе defendant contends that the trial сourt erred in sentencing him in accordance with the guidеlines. We agreе.
The sentencing guidеlines may be applied to crimes committed priоr to October 1, 1983, if a. defendant makes an affirmative selection to bе sentenced pursuant to them. In re Rules of Criminal Procedure, 439 So.2d 848 (Fla.1983); § 921.001(4)(а), Fla. Stat. (1983). In the present case, thе defendant made no affirmative selection. Neither his silence nor his аttorney’s pleа to the trial cоurt for probation evinced the dеfendant’s clear and unequivocаl acquiescеnce to sentеncing under the guidelines. See Jordan v. State, 460 So.2d 477 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see also Ryan v. State, 482 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Kimsey v. State, 467 So.2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
For these reаsons, the defendаnt’s sentence is vаcated with direсtions to resen-tence the defendant in accordance with applicable sentences, including eligibility for *1149parole, unless the defendant affirmatively elects to be sentenced under the guidelines.
Sentence vacated and remanded for re-sentencing.