History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beaver v. Slear
168 Pa. 466
Pa.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

While we cannot assent to the proposition that, in a case such as this, the burden is on the plaintiff to show affirmatively that the defendant agreed to pay interest from the maturity of his note, we are not prepared to say, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, that the court erred in opening the judgment and letting the defendant into a defense. There was no such abuse of discretion as would justify us in reversing the decree complained of.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.

Case Details

Case Name: Beaver v. Slear
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 27, 1895
Citation: 168 Pa. 466
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 445
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.