437 So. 2d 594 | Ala. Civ. App. | 1983
This court's original opinion dated May 11, 1983 is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor:
This is an appeal by appellant, Ruth R. Beatty, from the order of the circuit court denying her petition for writ of certiorari and affirming the State Personnel Board's action in dismissing her from her State job. Appellant's dismissal arose from the following facts:
During her leave, appellant took a temporary Christmas job at Gayfers, after which she applied for unemployment compensation benefits. Appellant made no reference on her unemployment compensation application to the fact she was on sick leave from the State, but did make such a reference in her employment application.1 Each application is filed in a separate office and as a consequence, the fact that appellant was on sick leave was only brought to the attention of the unemployment compensation office after benefits had been paid to appellant and after an investigation had been ordered. Section
The panel determined appellant had only used poor judgment and recommended no disciplinary action. Nevertheless, after reviewing the nature of appellant's job, the investigation report as to appellant's illegal receipt of benefits, and the panel's finding of appellant's use of poor judgment, Ms. Hart decided to dismiss appellant for the good of the service.
Appellant appealed Ms. Hart's decision to the State Personnel Board. After a hearing, the Board found that the dismissal charges against appellant were proved and that such charges warranted her dismissal.
Appellant then filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the Circuit Court of Montgomery County. The court found the action of the Board affirming appellant's dismissal was substantiated by the facts and denied appellant's petition. Appellant appealed.
The issue for review is whether the facts as established warrant the dismissal of appellant. We find that they support the dismissal.
Section
We note appellant makes no issue of the circuit court's dismissal of her damages count against Ms. Hart. Matters not raised on appeal are waived. Williams v. Clark,
APPLICATION FOR REHEARING DENIED.
OPINION SUBSTITUTED.
AFFIRMED.
BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.